The whole process: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '{{Menu_MV_&_LV_architecture_selection_guide}} <br> __TOC__ The whole process is described briefly in the following paragraphs and illustrated on '''Figure D3'''.<br>The process …') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== Step 1: Choice of distribution architecture fundamentals == | |||
This involves defining the general features of the electrical installation. It is based on taking account of macroscopic characteristics concerning the installation and its usage.<br>These characteristics have an impact on the connection to the upstream network, MV circuits, the number of transformer substations, etc.<br>At the end of this step, we have several distribution schematic diagram solutions, which are used as a starting point for the single-line diagram. The definitive choice is confirmed at the end of the step 2.<br> | This involves defining the general features of the electrical installation. It is based on taking account of macroscopic characteristics concerning the installation and its usage.<br>These characteristics have an impact on the connection to the upstream network, MV circuits, the number of transformer substations, etc.<br>At the end of this step, we have several distribution schematic diagram solutions, which are used as a starting point for the single-line diagram. The definitive choice is confirmed at the end of the step 2.<br> | ||
== Step 2: choice of architecture details == | |||
This involves defining the electrical installation in more detail. It is based on the results of the previous step, as well as on satisfying criteria relative to implementation and operation of the installation.<br>The process loops back into step1 if the criteria are not satisfied. An iterative process allows several assessment criteria combinations to be analyzed.<br>At the end of this step, we have a detailed single-line diagram.<br> | This involves defining the electrical installation in more detail. It is based on the results of the previous step, as well as on satisfying criteria relative to implementation and operation of the installation.<br>The process loops back into step1 if the criteria are not satisfied. An iterative process allows several assessment criteria combinations to be analyzed.<br>At the end of this step, we have a detailed single-line diagram.<br> | ||
== Step 3: choice of equipment == | |||
The choice of equipment to be implemented is carried out in this stage, and results from the choice of architecture. The choices are made from the manufacturer catalogues, in order to satisfy certain criteria.<br>This stage is looped back into step 2 if the characteristics are not satisfied. | The choice of equipment to be implemented is carried out in this stage, and results from the choice of architecture. The choices are made from the manufacturer catalogues, in order to satisfy certain criteria.<br>This stage is looped back into step 2 if the characteristics are not satisfied. | ||
== Assessment == | |||
This assessment step allows the Engineering Office to have figures as a basis for discussions with the customer and other players.<br>According to the result of these discussions, it may be possible to loop back into step 1. | This assessment step allows the Engineering Office to have figures as a basis for discussions with the customer and other players.<br>According to the result of these discussions, it may be possible to loop back into step 1. | ||
Revision as of 15:21, 8 June 2011
The whole process is described briefly in the following paragraphs and illustrated on Figure D3.
The process described in this document is not intended as the only solution. This document is a guide intended for the use of electrical installation designers.
Fig. D3: Flow diagram for choosing the electrical distribution architecture
Step 1: Choice of distribution architecture fundamentals
This involves defining the general features of the electrical installation. It is based on taking account of macroscopic characteristics concerning the installation and its usage.
These characteristics have an impact on the connection to the upstream network, MV circuits, the number of transformer substations, etc.
At the end of this step, we have several distribution schematic diagram solutions, which are used as a starting point for the single-line diagram. The definitive choice is confirmed at the end of the step 2.
Step 2: choice of architecture details
This involves defining the electrical installation in more detail. It is based on the results of the previous step, as well as on satisfying criteria relative to implementation and operation of the installation.
The process loops back into step1 if the criteria are not satisfied. An iterative process allows several assessment criteria combinations to be analyzed.
At the end of this step, we have a detailed single-line diagram.
Step 3: choice of equipment
The choice of equipment to be implemented is carried out in this stage, and results from the choice of architecture. The choices are made from the manufacturer catalogues, in order to satisfy certain criteria.
This stage is looped back into step 2 if the characteristics are not satisfied.
Assessment
This assessment step allows the Engineering Office to have figures as a basis for discussions with the customer and other players.
According to the result of these discussions, it may be possible to loop back into step 1.
