Detailed characteristics of the external SCPD: Difference between revisions

From Electrical Installation Guide
Home > Overvoltage protection > Surge protection technical supplements > Detailed characteristics of the external SCPD
m (r2.7.2) (robot Adding: zh:外部短路保护器的详细特征)
(updated according to guide 2013 (figures re-numbered))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Menu_Protection_against_voltage_surges_in_LV}}
{{Menu_Overvoltage_protection}}
<br>
 
__TOC__
__TOC__


Line 11: Line 11:
*For a given rating, the current wave withstand capability is better with a circuit breaker than with a fuse device.
*For a given rating, the current wave withstand capability is better with a circuit breaker than with a fuse device.


'''Figure J50 '''below shows the results of the voltage wave withstand tests:  
'''Figure J53 '''below shows the results of the voltage wave withstand tests:  


*to protect a SPD defined for Imax = 20 kA, the external SCPD to be chosen is either a MCCB 16 A or a Fuse aM 63 A,
*to protect a SPD defined for Imax = 20 kA, the external SCPD to be chosen is either a MCCB 16 A or a Fuse aM 63 A,
Line 23: Line 23:
<br>[[Image:Fig J50.jpg|left]] <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>
<br>[[Image:Fig J50.jpg|left]] <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>


'''''Fig. J50:''' Comparison of SCPDs voltage wave withstand capabilities for Imax = 20 kA and Imax = 40 kA''  
'''''Fig. J53:''' Comparison of SCPDs voltage wave withstand capabilities for Imax = 20 kA and Imax = 40 kA''  


----
----
Line 40: Line 40:
== Protection from impedant short circuits  ==
== Protection from impedant short circuits  ==


An impedant short circuit dissipates a lot of energy and should be eliminated very quickly to prevent damage to the installation and to the SPD.<br>'''Figure J51 '''compares the response time and the energy limitation of a protection system by a 63 A aM fuse and a 25 A circuit breaker.<br>These two protection systems have the same 8/20 µs current wave withstand capability (27 kA and 30 kA respectively).  
An impedant short circuit dissipates a lot of energy and should be eliminated very quickly to prevent damage to the installation and to the SPD.<br>'''Figure J54 '''compares the response time and the energy limitation of a protection system by a 63 A aM fuse and a 25 A circuit breaker.<br>These two protection systems have the same 8/20 µs current wave withstand capability (27 kA and 30 kA respectively).  


----
----


<br>[[Image:Fig J51.jpg|left]] <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>'''''Fig. J51:''' Comparison of time/current and energy limitations curves for a circuit breaker and a fuse having the same 8/20 µs current wave withstand capability''  
<br>[[Image:Fig J51.jpg|left]] <br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>'''''Fig. J54:''' Comparison of time/current and energy limitations curves for a circuit breaker and a fuse having the same 8/20 µs current wave withstand capability''  


----
----


[[zh:外部短路保护器的详细特征]]
[[zh:外部短路保护器的详细特征]]

Revision as of 15:40, 20 August 2013



Current wave withstand

The current wave withstand tests on external SCPDs show as follows:

  • For a given rating and technology (NH or cylindrical fuse), the current wave withstand capability is better with an aM type fuse (motor protection) than with a gG type fuse (general use).
  • For a given rating, the current wave withstand capability is better with a circuit breaker than with a fuse device.

Figure J53 below shows the results of the voltage wave withstand tests:

  • to protect a SPD defined for Imax = 20 kA, the external SCPD to be chosen is either a MCCB 16 A or a Fuse aM 63 A,

Note: in this case, a Fuse gG 63 A is not suitable.

  • to protect a SPD defined for Imax = 40 kA, the external SCPD to be chosen is either a MCCB 63 A or a Fuse aM 125 A,


Fig J50.jpg





















Fig. J53: Comparison of SCPDs voltage wave withstand capabilities for Imax = 20 kA and Imax = 40 kA


Installed Up voltage protection level

In general:

  • The voltage drop across the terminals of a circuit breaker is higher than that across the terminals of a fuse device. This is because the impedance of the circuit-breaker components (thermal and magnetic tripping devices) is higher than that of a fuse.However:
  • The difference between the voltage drops remains slight for current waves not exceeding 10 kA (95% of cases);
  • The installed Up voltage protection level also takes into account the cabling impedance. This can be high in the case of a fuse technology (protection device remote from the SPD) and low in the case of a circuit-breaker technology (circuit breaker close to, and even integrated into the SPD).

Note: The installed Up voltage protection level is the sum of the voltage drops:
  - in the SPD;
  - in the external SCPD;
  - in the equipment cabling

Protection from impedant short circuits

An impedant short circuit dissipates a lot of energy and should be eliminated very quickly to prevent damage to the installation and to the SPD.
Figure J54 compares the response time and the energy limitation of a protection system by a 63 A aM fuse and a 25 A circuit breaker.
These two protection systems have the same 8/20 µs current wave withstand capability (27 kA and 30 kA respectively).



Fig J51.jpg




















Fig. J54: Comparison of time/current and energy limitations curves for a circuit breaker and a fuse having the same 8/20 µs current wave withstand capability


zh:外部短路保护器的详细特征

Share